From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit them to point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters with fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way to ruin someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make Light fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.
Thread: Projectile throwes in space combat
7 posts.
To this point I went and looked at Mass Drivers and Autocannons in FF&S.
The upper limits for muzzle velocity make slug throwers viable per say as
the upper limit is 6000m/s which translates into 360 range (36 light
seconds) bands in combat turn for space combat. However the required MW of
power to move a KEAP round is staggering so you are limited to slugs that
are not very useful verse armored targets.
Obviously you don't need 360 range bands to be effective as others
discussed in another thread you only need to be able to cover 40ish range
bands due to anything beyond that being ineffective.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Charles P <> wrote:
> **
>
>
> From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit
> them to point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters
> with fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way
> to ruin someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make
> Light fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.
>
>
>
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
would have been deserved.
The upper limits for muzzle velocity make slug throwers viable per say as
the upper limit is 6000m/s which translates into 360 range (36 light
seconds) bands in combat turn for space combat. However the required MW of
power to move a KEAP round is staggering so you are limited to slugs that
are not very useful verse armored targets.
Obviously you don't need 360 range bands to be effective as others
discussed in another thread you only need to be able to cover 40ish range
bands due to anything beyond that being ineffective.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Charles P <> wrote:
> **
>
>
> From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit
> them to point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters
> with fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way
> to ruin someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make
> Light fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.
>
>
>
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
would have been deserved.
At 6000ms-1 a slug from whatever source would only cover 10,800 km in a 30
minute turn (ie less than half a hex)
6000ms-1 for 1800 seconds (not accounting for launching vessels vector).
Antony
From: []
On Behalf Of John Potter
Sent: Friday, 29 June 2012 9:28 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
To this point I went and looked at Mass Drivers and Autocannons in FF&S. The
upper limits for muzzle velocity make slug throwers viable per say as the
upper limit is 6000m/s which translates into 360 range (36 light seconds)
bands in combat turn for space combat. However the required MW of power to
move a KEAP round is staggering so you are limited to slugs that are not
very useful verse armored targets.
Obviously you don't need 360 range bands to be effective as others discussed
in another thread you only need to be able to cover 40ish range bands due to
anything beyond that being ineffective.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Charles P <> wrote:
>From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit
them to point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters
with fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way
to ruin someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make
Light fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
would have been deserved.
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5099 - Release Date: 06/28/12
minute turn (ie less than half a hex)
6000ms-1 for 1800 seconds (not accounting for launching vessels vector).
Antony
From: []
On Behalf Of John Potter
Sent: Friday, 29 June 2012 9:28 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
To this point I went and looked at Mass Drivers and Autocannons in FF&S. The
upper limits for muzzle velocity make slug throwers viable per say as the
upper limit is 6000m/s which translates into 360 range (36 light seconds)
bands in combat turn for space combat. However the required MW of power to
move a KEAP round is staggering so you are limited to slugs that are not
very useful verse armored targets.
Obviously you don't need 360 range bands to be effective as others discussed
in another thread you only need to be able to cover 40ish range bands due to
anything beyond that being ineffective.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Charles P <> wrote:
>From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit
them to point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters
with fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way
to ruin someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make
Light fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
would have been deserved.
_____
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5099 - Release Date: 06/28/12
6000m/sec
30min = 1800 sec
1800 * 6000 = 10,800,000m in 30min
10,800,000 / 30k = 360 range bands
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Antony Farrell <>wrote:
> **
>
>
> At 6000ms-1 a slug from whatever source would only cover 10,800 km in a 30
> minute turn (ie less than half a hex)****
>
> 6000ms-1 for 1800 seconds (not accounting for launching vessels vector). *
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> Antony****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [
> ] *On Behalf Of *John Potter
> *Sent:* Friday, 29 June 2012 9:28 PM
> *To:*
> *Subject:* Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat****
>
> ** **
>
>
>
> To this point I went and looked at Mass Drivers and Autocannons in FF&S.
> The upper limits for muzzle velocity make slug throwers viable per say as
> the upper limit is 6000m/s which translates into 360 range (36 light
> seconds) bands in combat turn for space combat. However the required MW of
> power to move a KEAP round is staggering so you are limited to slugs that
> are not very useful verse armored targets. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Obviously you don't need 360 range bands to be effective as others
> discussed in another thread you only need to be able to cover 40ish range
> bands due to anything beyond that being ineffective. ****
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Charles P <> wrote:**
> **
>
> ****
>
> From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit
> them to point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters
> with fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way
> to ruin someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make
> Light fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.**
> **
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
> would have been deserved.****
>
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ****
> ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5099 - Release Date: 06/28/12*
> ***
>
>
>
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
would have been deserved.
30min = 1800 sec
1800 * 6000 = 10,800,000m in 30min
10,800,000 / 30k = 360 range bands
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Antony Farrell <>wrote:
> **
>
>
> At 6000ms-1 a slug from whatever source would only cover 10,800 km in a 30
> minute turn (ie less than half a hex)****
>
> 6000ms-1 for 1800 seconds (not accounting for launching vessels vector). *
> ***
>
> ** **
>
> Antony****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* [
> ] *On Behalf Of *John Potter
> *Sent:* Friday, 29 June 2012 9:28 PM
> *To:*
> *Subject:* Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat****
>
> ** **
>
>
>
> To this point I went and looked at Mass Drivers and Autocannons in FF&S.
> The upper limits for muzzle velocity make slug throwers viable per say as
> the upper limit is 6000m/s which translates into 360 range (36 light
> seconds) bands in combat turn for space combat. However the required MW of
> power to move a KEAP round is staggering so you are limited to slugs that
> are not very useful verse armored targets. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Obviously you don't need 360 range bands to be effective as others
> discussed in another thread you only need to be able to cover 40ish range
> bands due to anything beyond that being ineffective. ****
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Charles P <> wrote:**
> **
>
> ****
>
> From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit
> them to point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters
> with fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way
> to ruin someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make
> Light fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.**
> **
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
> would have been deserved.****
>
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ****
> ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5099 - Release Date: 06/28/12*
> ***
>
>
>
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
would have been deserved.
The old unit conversion problem (gets us all sometimes...)
6000 m/sec = 6 km/sec
1800 sec*6 km = 10,800 km in 30 mins
10,800/30,000 = 0.36 hexes
________________________________
From: John Potter
Sent: Friday, 29 June 2012, 23:07
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
6000m/sec
30min = 1800 sec
1800 * 6000 = 10,800,000m in 30min
10,800,000 / 30k = 360 range bands
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Antony Farrell <> wrote:
>
>At 6000ms-1 a slug from whatever source would only cover 10,800 km in a 30 minute turn (ie less than half a hex)
>6000ms-1 for 1800 seconds (not accounting for launching vessels vector).
>
>Antony
>
>From: [] On Behalf Of John Potter
>Sent: Friday, 29 June 2012 9:28 PM
>To:
>Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
>
>
>
>To this point I went and looked at Mass Drivers and Autocannons in FF&S. The upper limits for muzzle velocity make slug throwers viable per say as the upper limit is 6000m/s which translates into 360 range (36 light seconds) bands in combat turn for space combat. However the required MW of power to move a KEAP round is staggering so you are limited to slugs that are not very useful verse armored targets.
>
>Obviously you don't need 360 range bands to be effective as others discussed in another thread you only need to be able to cover 40ish range bands due to anything beyond that being ineffective.
>On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Charles P <> wrote:
>
>From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit them to point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters with fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way to ruin someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make Light fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.
>
>
>
>
>--
>
>If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you would have been deserved.
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
>No virus found in this message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5099 - Release Date: 06/28/12
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you would have been deserved.
6000 m/sec = 6 km/sec
1800 sec*6 km = 10,800 km in 30 mins
10,800/30,000 = 0.36 hexes
________________________________
From: John Potter
Sent: Friday, 29 June 2012, 23:07
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
6000m/sec
30min = 1800 sec
1800 * 6000 = 10,800,000m in 30min
10,800,000 / 30k = 360 range bands
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Antony Farrell <> wrote:
>
>At 6000ms-1 a slug from whatever source would only cover 10,800 km in a 30 minute turn (ie less than half a hex)
>6000ms-1 for 1800 seconds (not accounting for launching vessels vector).
>
>Antony
>
>From: [] On Behalf Of John Potter
>Sent: Friday, 29 June 2012 9:28 PM
>To:
>Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
>
>
>
>To this point I went and looked at Mass Drivers and Autocannons in FF&S. The upper limits for muzzle velocity make slug throwers viable per say as the upper limit is 6000m/s which translates into 360 range (36 light seconds) bands in combat turn for space combat. However the required MW of power to move a KEAP round is staggering so you are limited to slugs that are not very useful verse armored targets.
>
>Obviously you don't need 360 range bands to be effective as others discussed in another thread you only need to be able to cover 40ish range bands due to anything beyond that being ineffective.
>On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Charles P <> wrote:
>
>From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit them to point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters with fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way to ruin someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make Light fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.
>
>
>
>
>--
>
>If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you would have been deserved.
>
>
>
>
>
>________________________________
>
>No virus found in this message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5099 - Release Date: 06/28/12
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you would have been deserved.
As I was saying .Does not need to be over range zero for being a point
defense/anti small craft or a strike fighter weapon.What is the range of a
fusion weapon in space combat?
________________________________
From: Eamon Watters
Sent: Fri, June 29, 2012 9:31:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
The old unit conversion problem (gets us all sometimes...)
6000 m/sec = 6 km/sec
1800 sec*6 km = 10,800 km in 30 mins
10,800/30,000 = 0.36 hexes
________________________________
From: John Potter
Sent: Friday, 29 June 2012, 23:07
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
6000m/sec
30min = 1800 sec
1800 * 6000 = 10,800,000m in 30min
10,800,000 / 30k = 360 range bands
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Antony Farrell <> wrote:
>
>At 6000ms-1 a slug from whatever source would only cover 10,800 km in a 30
>minute turn (ie less than half a hex)
>6000ms-1 for 1800 seconds (not accounting for launching vessels vector).
>
>Antony
>
>From: [] On
>Behalf Of John Potter
>Sent: Friday, 29 June 2012 9:28 PM
>To:
>Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
>
>
>
>To this point I went and looked at Mass Drivers and Autocannons in FF&S. The
>upper limits for muzzle velocity make slug throwers viable per say as the upper
>limit is 6000m/s which translates into 360 range (36 light seconds) bands in
>combat turn for space combat. However the required MW of power to move a KEAP
>round is staggering so you are limited to slugs that are not very useful verse
>armored targets.
>
>Obviously you don't need 360 range bands to be effective as others discussed in
>another thread you only need to be able to cover 40ish range bands due to
>anything beyond that being ineffective.
>On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Charles P <> wrote:
>
>From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit them to
>point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters with
>fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way to ruin
>someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make Light
>fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.
>
>
>
>
>--
>
>If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you would
>have been deserved.
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________
>No virus found in this message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5099 - Release Date: 06/28/12
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you would
have been deserved.
defense/anti small craft or a strike fighter weapon.What is the range of a
fusion weapon in space combat?
________________________________
From: Eamon Watters
Sent: Fri, June 29, 2012 9:31:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
The old unit conversion problem (gets us all sometimes...)
6000 m/sec = 6 km/sec
1800 sec*6 km = 10,800 km in 30 mins
10,800/30,000 = 0.36 hexes
________________________________
From: John Potter
Sent: Friday, 29 June 2012, 23:07
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
6000m/sec
30min = 1800 sec
1800 * 6000 = 10,800,000m in 30min
10,800,000 / 30k = 360 range bands
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Antony Farrell <> wrote:
>
>At 6000ms-1 a slug from whatever source would only cover 10,800 km in a 30
>minute turn (ie less than half a hex)
>6000ms-1 for 1800 seconds (not accounting for launching vessels vector).
>
>Antony
>
>From: [] On
>Behalf Of John Potter
>Sent: Friday, 29 June 2012 9:28 PM
>To:
>Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
>
>
>
>To this point I went and looked at Mass Drivers and Autocannons in FF&S. The
>upper limits for muzzle velocity make slug throwers viable per say as the upper
>limit is 6000m/s which translates into 360 range (36 light seconds) bands in
>combat turn for space combat. However the required MW of power to move a KEAP
>round is staggering so you are limited to slugs that are not very useful verse
>armored targets.
>
>Obviously you don't need 360 range bands to be effective as others discussed in
>another thread you only need to be able to cover 40ish range bands due to
>anything beyond that being ineffective.
>On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Charles P <> wrote:
>
>From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit them to
>point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters with
>fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way to ruin
>someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make Light
>fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.
>
>
>
>
>--
>
>If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you would
>have been deserved.
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________
>No virus found in this message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5099 - Release Date: 06/28/12
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you would
have been deserved.
Yep unit conversion is problematic at times :) thanks
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Charles Popp <> wrote:
> **
>
>
> As I was saying .Does not need to be over range zero for being a point
> defense/anti small craft or a strike fighter weapon.What is the range of a
> fusion weapon in space combat?
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Eamon Watters <>
> *To:* "" <>
> *Sent:* Fri, June 29, 2012 9:31:00 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
>
>
>
> The old unit conversion problem (gets us all sometimes...)
>
> 6000 m/sec = 6 km/sec
> 1800 sec*6 km = 10,800 km in 30 mins
> 10,800/30,000 = 0.36 hexes
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* John Potter <>
> *To:*
> *Sent:* Friday, 29 June 2012, 23:07
> *Subject:* Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
>
>
> 6000m/sec
> 30min = 1800 sec
> 1800 * 6000 = 10,800,000m in 30min
> 10,800,000 / 30k = 360 range bands
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Antony Farrell <>wrote:
>
> **
>
> At 6000ms-1 a slug from whatever source would only cover 10,800 km in a
> 30 minute turn (ie less than half a hex)****
> 6000ms-1 for 1800 seconds (not accounting for launching vessels vector). *
> ***
> ** **
> Antony****
> ** **
> *From:* [
> ] *On Behalf Of *John Potter
> *Sent:* Friday, 29 June 2012 9:28 PM
> *To:*
> *Subject:* Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat****
> ** **
>
>
> To this point I went and looked at Mass Drivers and Autocannons in FF&S.
> The upper limits for muzzle velocity make slug throwers viable per say as
> the upper limit is 6000m/s which translates into 360 range (36 light
> seconds) bands in combat turn for space combat. However the required MW of
> power to move a KEAP round is staggering so you are limited to slugs that
> are not very useful verse armored targets. ****
> ** **
> Obviously you don't need 360 range bands to be effective as others
> discussed in another thread you only need to be able to cover 40ish range
> bands due to anything beyond that being ineffective. ****
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Charles P <> wrote:**
> **
> ****
> From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit
> them to point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters
> with fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way
> to ruin someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make
> Light fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.**
> **
>
>
> ****
> ** **
> --
> If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
> would have been deserved.****
>
>
>
> ****
> ****
> ------------------------------
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5099 - Release Date: 06/28/12*
> ***
>
>
>
>
> --
> If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
> would have been deserved.
>
>
>
>
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
would have been deserved.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Charles Popp <> wrote:
> **
>
>
> As I was saying .Does not need to be over range zero for being a point
> defense/anti small craft or a strike fighter weapon.What is the range of a
> fusion weapon in space combat?
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Eamon Watters <>
> *To:* "" <>
> *Sent:* Fri, June 29, 2012 9:31:00 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
>
>
>
> The old unit conversion problem (gets us all sometimes...)
>
> 6000 m/sec = 6 km/sec
> 1800 sec*6 km = 10,800 km in 30 mins
> 10,800/30,000 = 0.36 hexes
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* John Potter <>
> *To:*
> *Sent:* Friday, 29 June 2012, 23:07
> *Subject:* Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat
>
>
> 6000m/sec
> 30min = 1800 sec
> 1800 * 6000 = 10,800,000m in 30min
> 10,800,000 / 30k = 360 range bands
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Antony Farrell <>wrote:
>
> **
>
> At 6000ms-1 a slug from whatever source would only cover 10,800 km in a
> 30 minute turn (ie less than half a hex)****
> 6000ms-1 for 1800 seconds (not accounting for launching vessels vector). *
> ***
> ** **
> Antony****
> ** **
> *From:* [
> ] *On Behalf Of *John Potter
> *Sent:* Friday, 29 June 2012 9:28 PM
> *To:*
> *Subject:* Re: [Traveller_TNE] Projectile throwes in space combat****
> ** **
>
>
> To this point I went and looked at Mass Drivers and Autocannons in FF&S.
> The upper limits for muzzle velocity make slug throwers viable per say as
> the upper limit is 6000m/s which translates into 360 range (36 light
> seconds) bands in combat turn for space combat. However the required MW of
> power to move a KEAP round is staggering so you are limited to slugs that
> are not very useful verse armored targets. ****
> ** **
> Obviously you don't need 360 range bands to be effective as others
> discussed in another thread you only need to be able to cover 40ish range
> bands due to anything beyond that being ineffective. ****
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Charles P <> wrote:**
> **
> ****
> From looking and reading everything . Due to lack of range I would limit
> them to point defense and mounting on fighter. If you arm Strike fighters
> with fusion/plasma guns then why not slug throwers? It would be a nice way
> to ruin someones days . A nice nimble fighter chews you up. Might even make
> Light fighters viable as offensive weapons and also as anti-small craft.**
> **
>
>
> ****
> ** **
> --
> If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
> would have been deserved.****
>
>
>
> ****
> ****
> ------------------------------
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2437/5099 - Release Date: 06/28/12*
> ***
>
>
>
>
> --
> If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
> would have been deserved.
>
>
>
>
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you
would have been deserved.