Yup, Heplar makes sense, maybe I'm thinking in MT/CT terms, but thought jump fuel volume was biggest culprit?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 27, 2012, at 12:41, "" <> wrote:
>
>
> With reaction drives always going to need large volumes of space for reaction mass, if nothing else. IIRC CT power plants were much more hungry so not as big of a disparity IIRC
>
>
> ---
> from my T989
>
>
> Scott Quigg wrote:
>
>
> Has anyone looked into storing fuel via metallic storage? Figured TL15 couldn 't be too far out of scope. Was it part of or considered as Canon?
>
> It always stuck in my craw that such large volumes of space had to be dedicated to raw/inefficient/vulnerable fuel storage.
>
> Sure, ship design would be changed radically, but I always wanted to build a Super Star Destroyer like "dreadnought".
>
> Cheers,
> Quigg
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>