Agreed, the Type J would be 'small potatos', but I'm still
working on the small craft for a 5000 ton mining vessel. More to
come...
Craige Cook
On Wed May 12 9:45 , Tim O'Reilly sent:
The contest(?) was for a mining ship design ... IMHO the Type J
would qualify - barely it would definitly be small potatoes
though only really suitable for a prospector. And significant
strikes/finds would be better dealt with by a larger vessel.
Still a small fleet of prospectors supporting a (much) larger
operation could be viable. T
I liked the write up on the J cause he specified downgrading the
electronics suite and turret being slaved to a position on the
bridge (I kinda figured that was mil spec anyway but the way he
wrote it up it seems that 1. the bridge controls/programs are not
mil-spec and the on-mount gunner position being eliminated makes
it difficult for the J to be used for piracy effectively without
considerable rework.) --- On Tue, 5/11/10, ca>
wrote:
From: ca>
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Mining Vessel Design Contest
To:
Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 6:19 PM
Wait...type j conversion, or new mining vessel design?
Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry From: Tim
O'Reilly Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 16:16:15 -0700 (PDT) To:
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Mining Vessel Design Contest
I've only seen the one entry on the Type J conversion
hit the site T
--- On Tue, 5/11/10, wrote:
From:
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Mining Vessel Design Contest
To:
Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2010, 9:18 AM
I have a design that I started, but never finished. I would
love to submit it (I thought I missed the deadline so put it
off). I can likely have it done by the end of this weekend, if
that would be okay.
Sent on the TELUS Mobility network with BlackBerry From: DED
Date: Sat, 08 May 2010 13:26:59 -0400 To: Traveller_tne@
yahoogroups. com Subject: [Traveller_TNE] Mining Vessel Design
Contest
Are all the entries in or are people still working on them?
\_/
DED