No. Not really. But its most enthusiastic users claim that its being "free" means it's better than Cartographer. I have been using the Campaign Cartographer for over four months and there is really no comparison. Autorealm is a bit clunky and unintuitive. Inkscape is better. You have to buy CC3 but I have found it to be worth every penny because of its ease of use. It is a CAD program but once you learn it, it is much faster than Autorealm and, IMHO, Illustrator and inkscape.
--- On Tue, 2/12/13, Master Uxi
> wrote:
From: Master Uxi
>
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Looking for Deck Plan software
To:
Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2013, 7:15 PM
I was using Autorealm a few years ago but it was pretty clunky. Has it improved?
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Richard Crowley
> wrote:
I just want to say that the problem with cosmographer is that you must buy the Campaign Cartographer first and then the Cosmographer add-on. Autorealm is free and also has examples of deckplans using its own symbol libraries. To me, Cosmographer is much easier to use and produces much better results than autorealm but I think you would like to check both of them before making a final decision
--- On Tue, 2/12/13, John Potter
> wrote:
From: John Potter
>
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Looking for Deck Plan software
To: "traveller_tne"
>
Date: Tuesday, February 12, 2013, 6:09 PM
Some one has already done TNE/CT ships in this software
http://www.profantasy.com/products/cc3.asp
Specific feature set
http://www.profantasy.com/products/cos3_examples.asp
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:52 AM, DED
> wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone have any recommendations for software that I should use to
generate deck plans. I've got some ships to create and deck plans (not
to mention illustrations) help breathe life into one's designs. I used
to use pencils and graph paper but as we're in the 21st century, I
should probably go digital. ;-)
\_/
DED
--
If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you would have been deserved.