that's also a point but since traveler is such a hand-wavium anyways let's "assume" (a truly dangerous word) and say that this has become practice, and that such code is hard to find - not impossible, but truly difficult. And to remove it without destroying the program would require some high powered computer skills - available for a price I'm sure discounts available to the "connected," etc., etc.
OTOH going back to the 3d printer, such a fabrication module or "fabber" / exists in 1a. real life machine shops with differing capabilities whether in a town or on a ship. Repair ships have better, and more extensive capabilities than the run of the mill vessel.
1b. Some shops are more geared for one product line than another, and to switch requires more extensive re-tooling - the 3d printer tech only advances this to a degree the size limitation being the primary restriction for them.
2. the use of fabbers also exist in the realm of SF and what we see now, may become common in such a future - Star Trek food production and its mishaps being one area of several with wide possibilities.
regards
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 6:12 AM, Mario Butter <> wrote:
>If this "shutdown date" is not documented and agreed to by the customer, I would consider this unethical and borderline fraudulent. It's nothing short of extortion. As a software engineer, I would never put code like this into a client's software, and I would let the powers that be know about any that I find (I have - and removed them; other companies have been sued because of these).
>
>
>--
>Mario
>
>http://mario.silent-tower.org/
>
>
>On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Ian Wilson <> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Hi,
>>The real issue in all this maybe cost, and to a degree copyright.
>>The Traveller universe works differently in regard to its commercial relationships with individual planets. The Imperium strives to make no world truly independent and self sustaining.
>>So would it be commercially viable for a starship crew to 3D print or cnc cut their own firearms, against a world of 3 billion who make nothing but shotguns and carbines.
>>A slobbering tale to add with reference to computer boards etc. I work in telecoms, a company I work along side brought several telephone exchanges via another company. With the supplier they had a maintence package (all normal industry stuff). To save some money they decided to unofficially drop the support package. Unknown to the the supplier had fitted a date code into its software, which when the maintence was performed was reset. Predictably the date expired at 4pm on a Friday afternoon, all the exchanges shut down, much to the duty on calls misery.
>>The point being when being pursued by star destroyers, the last thing you need is copyright issues with your jump drive :-) due to dodgy parts.
>>Ian
>
>
>
>
OTOH going back to the 3d printer, such a fabrication module or "fabber" / exists in 1a. real life machine shops with differing capabilities whether in a town or on a ship. Repair ships have better, and more extensive capabilities than the run of the mill vessel.
1b. Some shops are more geared for one product line than another, and to switch requires more extensive re-tooling - the 3d printer tech only advances this to a degree the size limitation being the primary restriction for them.
2. the use of fabbers also exist in the realm of SF and what we see now, may become common in such a future - Star Trek food production and its mishaps being one area of several with wide possibilities.
regards
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 6:12 AM, Mario Butter <> wrote:
>If this "shutdown date" is not documented and agreed to by the customer, I would consider this unethical and borderline fraudulent. It's nothing short of extortion. As a software engineer, I would never put code like this into a client's software, and I would let the powers that be know about any that I find (I have - and removed them; other companies have been sued because of these).
>
>
>--
>Mario
>
>http://mario.silent-tower.org/
>
>
>On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Ian Wilson <> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Hi,
>>The real issue in all this maybe cost, and to a degree copyright.
>>The Traveller universe works differently in regard to its commercial relationships with individual planets. The Imperium strives to make no world truly independent and self sustaining.
>>So would it be commercially viable for a starship crew to 3D print or cnc cut their own firearms, against a world of 3 billion who make nothing but shotguns and carbines.
>>A slobbering tale to add with reference to computer boards etc. I work in telecoms, a company I work along side brought several telephone exchanges via another company. With the supplier they had a maintence package (all normal industry stuff). To save some money they decided to unofficially drop the support package. Unknown to the the supplier had fitted a date code into its software, which when the maintence was performed was reset. Predictably the date expired at 4pm on a Friday afternoon, all the exchanges shut down, much to the duty on calls misery.
>>The point being when being pursued by star destroyers, the last thing you need is copyright issues with your jump drive :-) due to dodgy parts.
>>Ian
>
>
>
>