Marishal Adventures was the imprint the Keiths used to publish their folio adventures. IIRC there was one folio series set in Reaver's Deep - Flare Star, and one standalone - Escape. Other published Reaver's Deep material was "Night of Conquest" in CT Double Adventure 6, Lots of the Gamelords Traveller books were set there too. Reaver's Deep was also the focus of FASA's Far Traveller, the successor magazine to High Passage.
Eamon
________________________________
Sent: Monday, 2 July 2012, 12:06
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Re: Brett's Reavers' Deep
My guess would be one of the Keith bros' works that they published. I
think maybe Marischal Adventures or something like that. I think they had
a couple of names over the years that I can't recall right now. That stuff
was under official license from GDW during the CT era, but as time went by
there developed a distinction between GDW stuff as official-official and
licensed stuff as semi-maybe-official, depending upon the details.
> Ah, this raises another question for me. All my work has it as Reavers'
> Deep because that is how it is written in the Keith Brother's work.
> However the Traveller Wiki states;
>
> "Reavers' Deep: Alternate name for Reaver's Deep. Although the singular
> form is correct, so many people believe that this must be a mistake (after
> all, there were a lot more than just one reaver) that the plural form has
> become an accepted variant. "
>
> Does anyone know where the name originally appeared?
>
> Brett.
Eamon
________________________________
Sent: Monday, 2 July 2012, 12:06
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Re: Brett's Reavers' Deep
My guess would be one of the Keith bros' works that they published. I
think maybe Marischal Adventures or something like that. I think they had
a couple of names over the years that I can't recall right now. That stuff
was under official license from GDW during the CT era, but as time went by
there developed a distinction between GDW stuff as official-official and
licensed stuff as semi-maybe-official, depending upon the details.
> Ah, this raises another question for me. All my work has it as Reavers'
> Deep because that is how it is written in the Keith Brother's work.
> However the Traveller Wiki states;
>
> "Reavers' Deep: Alternate name for Reaver's Deep. Although the singular
> form is correct, so many people believe that this must be a mistake (after
> all, there were a lot more than just one reaver) that the plural form has
> become an accepted variant. "
>
> Does anyone know where the name originally appeared?
>
> Brett.