Ah, this raises another question for me. All my work has it as Reavers' Deep because that is how it is written in the Keith Brother's work. However the Traveller Wiki states;
"Reavers' Deep: Alternate name for Reaver's Deep. Although the singular form is correct, so many people believe that this must be a mistake (after all, there were a lot more than just one reaver) that the plural form has become an accepted variant. "
Does anyone know where the name originally appeared?
Brett.
>
> Oops, put the apostrophe in the wrong place. A deep belonging to more than one Reaver.
>
> Bad Dave.
>
> ---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
> Subject: Brett's Reaver's Deep
> From: dcndcn13@...
> Date: Tue, June 19, 2012 3:00 pm
> To:
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Brett--
>
> Sorry for the length of time it has taken me to get back to you.
>
> I've looked at your site and the four issues of the 'zine, and I really
> like it/them.
>
"Reavers' Deep: Alternate name for Reaver's Deep. Although the singular form is correct, so many people believe that this must be a mistake (after all, there were a lot more than just one reaver) that the plural form has become an accepted variant. "
Does anyone know where the name originally appeared?
Brett.
>
> Oops, put the apostrophe in the wrong place. A deep belonging to more than one Reaver.
>
> Bad Dave.
>
> ---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
> Subject: Brett's Reaver's Deep
> From: dcndcn13@...
> Date: Tue, June 19, 2012 3:00 pm
> To:
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Brett--
>
> Sorry for the length of time it has taken me to get back to you.
>
> I've looked at your site and the four issues of the 'zine, and I really
> like it/them.
>