Re: Credit where credit is due

Part of thread: Credit where credit is due · 1 reply ↳ In reply to Re: Credit where credit is due — Charles Popp Re: Credit where credit is due — master.uxi


They weren't based on the deckplans, but on the reference art we produced
for the basic Clipper "spine" plus the Manta fuel skimmer, plus the
200-ton modules, 100-ton modules, 50-ton modules, etc. They may have done
the "bay mounted" semi-spinal weapon based on our verbal guidance.

Actually, that may not be entirely true. They may have based part of their
mini on Doug Chaffee's BL cover art, which was of course based on the
reference drawings, but Doug added some creative flourishes, like the
module that is carrying a bunch of loose barrels or spheres or drums.

Bottom line is that the minis are absolutely accurate and based on our GDW
designs to the extent that is humanly possible.

Yeah, they need to "clip." That was the problem with doing them in white
metal like that. They have to be glued, and that defeats the purpose of
the reconfigurable Clipper.

Dave

> I would assume the RAFM miniatures were based on that work? Would have
> loved to see a simple schematic identifying what's what on the molds.
> Always had the desire to cast a slightly bigger scale in resin and make
> them actually "clip" or something like that.
>
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:51 PM, <> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> They existed in draft print-out form about 18 or so years ago. He used a
>> simple graphical/drafting program.