Actually, I shouldn't say, "I'm pretty sure," and then turn around and
say, "am I lying?"
Let's pretend I said, "I THINK we deliberately..."
> I'm pretty sure we deliberately removed the "only one hardpoint per 100
> displacement tons" rule, as well as the "no jump-capable ships below 100
> tons," but also did not really trumpet that in the rules. "Hey, rule
> repealed, woo-hoo!"
>
> Can anyone corroborate that? I could be wrong about the hardpoints, but I
> know I'm not about the 100 ton jump limit.
>
> We also established that you could hang other weapon stations on starships
> as well, not just the classic starship turrets.
>
>> I haven't found my old ff&s book yet but was there some kind of hard
>> policy on the number of hard points you could put on a ship? I know the
>> standard was 1 per 100dt but I don't recall ever seeing it in ff&s.
>>
>> I ask because i've always been of the opinion for venturing out into the
>> wilds if the ship can fit, power and has the surface area to sustain 2
>> or
>> 3 turrets per 100 tons why the hell not?
>>
>> Derek Stanley
>> Sent from my iPhone...
>>
>
>
>