Re: Planetary Environments

Part of thread: Re: Planetary Environments · 1 reply ↳ In reply to Re: Planetary Environments — donm61873 Re: Planetary Environments — dcndcn13


Do you still have pretty much every binary star companion being a white dwarf? Do you still have habitable worlds orbiting white dwarfs or being in close binaries with white dwarfs in them? (Regina - an iconic system - can't exist as described. The white dwarf companion would have fried the system when it was in its red giant stage).

Did you change *all* of the world sizes to match the atmospheres (so vacuum worlds are asteroid belts now?). That's not a very elegant solution to the problem. Have you changed the worldgen to prevent it from generating the nonsensical atmospheres in the first place?

So now the Marches are have a lot of larger mainworlds and have fewer small mainworlds? Does this match the statistical distribution that the worldgen produces, or is this another case of the iconic sector not being generated using the standard worldgen rules?

--- In , "donm61873" <don.mckinney@...> wrote:
> We did change stellar data again, and for the Marches, we made the world size match the atmosphere, on the grounds that the Marches is where new players and referees will be starting.
>
> Especially when we found that if all you change is world size, it doesn't change the trade code.