EMP should, and is, a concern for any TL after nucs become available. Hardening something like a suit would be something in the planners minds from the get-go, being able to effectively accomplish that is another matter.
TL 15 for a certainty methinks
Tim
>________________________________
From: John Potter
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 8:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Re: Where are the EM Weapons?
>
>
>Â
>Unfortunately Powered Armor at TL 15 would probably be hardened vs EM also as it is used for space walking operations also or just consider battle field conditions it was designed to enter. EMP from nuclear weapons maybe a real concern at TL 15.
>
>
>On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Jake <> wrote:
>
>Â
>>I'd love to have an EMP grenade that shut down power armour!
>>
>>--- In , Tim O'Reilly <ret7army@...> wrote:
>>>
>>> EMP hardening in buildings has been around for quite some time already ... some of those that I've seen included metal walls 1/2" (12mm) thick, airlock doors and mesh covers on the air vents - all with the idea of stopping a strong EMP ... satellites, military ones anyway, have a version also but much lighter in weight, different tech approach ?ÃÂ for vehicle electronics the military has what's called a battle override switch which is used when the fuzes pop, hmmm, also think that if warned in advance they'd disconnect their antenna's so as to eliminate that route for the pulse...
>>> ÃÂ
>>>
>>>
>>> >________________________________
From: DED dedly@...
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 7:54 AM
Subject: [Traveller_TNE] Where are the EM Weapons?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >ÃÂ
>>
>>> >Obviously a game created in the 70's isn't going to get everything
>>> >right. However, except for /Emperor's Arsenal/ (from T4), there's really
>>> >a dearth of non-lethal weapons in most of Traveller's subsequent
>>> >editions. Ok, I'll admit I don't know what Mongoose gave us, but I'd be
>>> >surprised if there was a fundamental shift.
>>> >
>>> >This article (www.economist.com/node/21532245) talks about EM weapons
>>> >being used to disable the electronics on vehicles. It's not something
>>> >over the horizon. It's here now and in use
>>> >(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EA-18_Growler).
>>> >
>>> >In applying this towards Traveller, what would we say their use is? Is
>>> >it primarily a weapon that higher TL armies use against lower TL armies
>>> >as an act of mercy? Do higher TL worlds have the capability to provide
>>> >affordable shielding against EM attacks such that it really isn't a
>>> >factor? Is it just a means for local police and armies to control the
>>> >civilian population during uprisings without directly harming then
>>> >(though vehicles still have residual momentum)? Perhaps it's another
>>> >avenue that Virus exploited when bringing about the Collapse.
>>> >
>>> >The article mentions that the Active Denial System
>>> >(en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active_Denial_System) was deployed in Afghanistan
>>> >but never used. In fact, it was shipped home. It's too bad because it
>>> >would've been an excellent test of the concept.
>>> >
>>> >Thoughts?
>>> >
>>> >\_/
>>> >DED
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>If the world was fair then every bad thing that has ever happened to you would have been deserved.
>
>
>
>