--- In , Roger Malmstein <starwolf@...> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:32:14 -0000, "Donald McKinney"
> <don.mckinney@...> wrote:
>
> >--- In , Roger Malmstein <starwolf@> wrote:
> >> I feel that T5 should take this route rather than the route it is now
> >> taking.
> >
> >I have to ask (its in the job description)...
> >
> >What exactly is wrong with the route T5 is taking now?
I'm going to tell you what I told Evyn (and thank you also for keeping Marc's request). Can you e-mail me (at ) with an indepth "all the issues I have with T5"? No point in taking a lot of time on a TNE group discussing T5.
We're not past the point where we cannot deal with the issues you're going to raise, and since I'm the "HG" guy on the T5 development team, if you can explain it to me, you've explained it to the right guy.
And thanks for giving us honest feedback. That I appreciate.
As I've been working on the TNE errata, I'm starting to appreciate a game I have in the past disregarded. It really did try to fix some big holes in MT, and with FFS, it finished the MT work of Striker-izing the whole game. That needs to be in T5.