On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:32:14 -0000, "Donald McKinney"
<> wrote:
>--- In , Roger Malmstein <starwolf@...> wrote:
>> I feel that T5 should take this route rather than the route it is now
>> taking.
>
>I have to ask (its in the job description)...
>
>What exactly is wrong with the route T5 is taking now?
>
>
I can't get into details as that would violate the rules for the
closed T5 board on CotI.
But I don't like the way armor is handled. How many cm/armor points
are armor (UCP)factor 2? It sure as hell aint 2 when compared to other
weapons as FGMP or a tank cannon.And the ridiculous PP fuel
consumption. I don't even think MT had this poor fuel duration
compared to the fuel volume. And TNE uses a fraction of that for a
whole year in the same ship design (same tonnage and maneuver rating).
It is just too much of HG.