Re: Regency 1140 Naval Review: TaskRon 102

Part of thread: Re: Regency 1140 Naval Review: TaskRon 102 · 1 reply ↳ In reply to Re: Regency 1140 Naval Review: TaskRon 102 — whassupman03 Re: Regency 1140 Naval Review: TaskRon 102 — Tim O'Reilly
--- In , "whassupman03" wrote:
>
> Well we got our verdict. I will copy and paste the important contents
> of the letter from Mr. Gray...
>
> In a letter sent to SPROTOKNIGHT@...:
>
> "Thank you for refreshing my memory. Talk about cobwebs in the grey
> matter. I have no problem with other people reproducing my material
> beyond be given credit for my authorship and use of the material in its
> intended spirit. Btw some of the ships listed have been written up and
> can be found in the same archive."
>
> And as a result, we got our go-ahead. So we can now use his template
> given that we give him credit for his work.
>
> If anyone wants to see the rest of the letter, it is just a copy of
> what I wrote to him. But I will still send the letter to whoever wants
> the letter if you send me a request.
>
> I guess we will start after this post. One question though: How will
> we give him credit? Do we put a note into the final version? Or
> something else? I just want to make sure that credit is given to where
> it's due.
>
> Well thank you for your patience. And y'all have a Happy Thanksgiving!
>
> Sean

While you're just discussing the subject, you don't need to worry
about affixing credit. However, if you do any kind of formal write up,
whether here or on a web site, then just include his name among the
list of contributors. And if you feel a note is necessary explaining
that he started the thread that you're building on, then by all means
add it.

\_/
DED