Re: Regency 1140 Naval Review: TaskRon 102

Part of thread: Re: Regency 1140 Naval Review: TaskRon 102 · 1 reply ↳ In reply to Re: Regency 1140 Naval Review: TaskRon 102 — Tim O'Reilly Re: Regency 1140 Naval Review: TaskRon 102 — dedtraveller
Hello...

--- In , Tim O'Reilly <ret7army@...>
wrote:
>
> Interesting ... Patrol, Strike, and Quick Reaction based
essentially around destroyer, or reinforced destroyer formations...
> What I didn't see was what the expected role of TR101 or TR102
were... I'd want to say it was in the order listed P, S, QR but
really those are on the face of it just name changes... I mean that's
what DDs and CLs are for after all, and in emergencies always puts
them in short supply, but here goes some thoughts...
>
> How many DDs in a squadron? (DesRon)
> what is the squadron leader a CL or CA?
> What were the typical support vessels for a DesRon?
> These are need to know in order to figure out how to reconfigure
for the stated tasks.

These are good questions.

> I'm throwing some numbers out here w/o access to TNE cannon, tweak
from there.
> Old DesRon
> 8 DDs in a typical DesRon
> 1 CL as typical detached Destroyer Leader
> 1 DD tender per 4 - 6 DesRons assigned to fleet base or supply train
> no tankers assigned
> no supply vessels assigned normally, 1 per 4 DesRons at specified
bases for detached patrols old typical deployment

The old DesRons were small, but what I was suprised with was the
resources assigned to TR102 by Ferrosmith (I think that is her name.).

Her TR102 was conceived to be similar in size to what could be
conceived a small fleet. For example, the "Support Division," as she
called it, included at least 40 Empress Maravas, as well as 8 Bulk
Carriers, 8 Fleet Tankers, and other things.

Her primary patrol and communication units were flotilla-sized, and
each squadron had six of them (4 for patrol, 2 for communications).
It was rather interesting to see that. And they even had more
resources available, including marines. I am still curious as to why
a squadron would be conceived as such.

> Patrol Task Squadron
> 8 DDs, 1 CL or CA as leader,
> DD Tender as mobile base, logistics HQ
> 1 dedicated med - large frieghter as logistics support
> 1 -2 dedicated tankers, with support craft to get raw material and
purify it
> (this was the choke point for Patrol TR101 the tankers had a dual
role,
> 1. to accumulate and store fuel for the entire DesRon and
> 2. to accompany the DesRon on patrol and so needed to be faster
than the average freighter-tanker
> as such the requirement was written that these ships had to have
their own small craft and ... pork it up ...}
>
> Strike Task Squadron (TR 102)
> 3 DDs & 1 CL leader (escorts)
> 2-4 CAs (think of as heavy escorts - don't need to be much faster
than the BCs)
> 4 BCs (heavy punch for the Strike force yet still pretty fast)
> 1 Tender (it's a repair ship, think of it as a purpose built
frieghter)
> 2 Supply Ships
> Tankers as needed
>
> Quick Reaction Task Force
> 4 DDs
> 4 CLs (one designated as escort leader)
> 4 CAs
> Possibly 1-2 BCs (TF leader)
> 1 fast tender, 2 fast freighters, 2 fast tankers
> other attachments as needed - emphasis on fast

While the fleet-sized squadron conceived by Ferrosmith is curious, I
tend to think that it is interesting, because it took around three
years (If I remember correctly) to summon the resources necessary to
activate TR101. What I am saying is that maybe it was meant this
way, to provide a large squadron capable of long-range patrol,
strike, or otherwise over a wide area.

I wonder if we could somehow develop something similar. It would
probably involve utilizing Ferrosmith's post as a basis, although I
hope she won't mind. I think we'll have to ask her to use it.
Still, if we did go through with it, it would yield something that
would simulate the naval might of the Regency, and would be helpful
in a 1140 campaign.

Sean