Re: [Traveller_TNE] Daily Digest

Part of thread: Daily Digest · 1 reply ↳ In reply to Re: [Traveller_TNE] Daily Digest — [Traveller_TNE] Re: [Traveller_TNE] Daily Digest — Derek Stanley [Traveller_TNE]

Any "new" comers to the list, we've had our moments when conversations were either, or both, rather heated/salty and/or moving along at a rapid clip.  Getting over 20 emails a day was a bit much when you're at work.
😉

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Derek Stanley [Traveller_TNE] <> wrote:
 

Nope, didn’t vanish, you just posted twice...

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 13, 2018, at 8:32 AM, [Traveller_TNE] <> wrote:

 

Ok, my first reply seems to have vanished, so let me try again.


In the past, daily volumes were so high that getting pinged by individual emails was annoying (assuming I was working). It was easier for me to review the day's discussion all at once in digest format at a time that was convenient for me. And since I'd "knighted" Tim with moderator powers, there wasn't a need for me to screen the conversations for bad behavior. 

But just as there really hasn't been any bad behavior for 10 years, (you're absolutely right) the volume of email has been drastically reduced. Sure, we get the occasional spike in traffic, but it seems to happen quarterly rather than weekly or daily.

I'll switch over to individual emails and see if that works. 

\_/
DED
TNE @ Yahoo ml Admin


---In , <> wrote :

One thing I can't quite follow:

With the usual low-volume of the ML, why use the Digest at all?

Eamon

--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 8/3/18, Rupert Boleyn [Traveller_TNE] <> wrote:


I have no particular preference either way, but I'm not using the digest function. If it's crapping out and people are using it,
moving would seem to be the sensible option.


Rupert Boleyn <>

Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief