Asexual makes the most sense, given he had to resort to the cloning.
Homosexual, especially in 21st century context makes no sense. Fitting the
whole Imperial and aristocratic nobility motif fits with a more historical
method where marriage is part of politics, alliance, bloodline propagation,
etc. Who one has romantic attachment to is secondly, if not tertiary to
such concerns as duty. Pleasure even further down.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015, 10:43 Mario Butter
[Traveller_TNE] <> wrote:
>
>
> Is there a reason it matters?
>
> --
> Mario
>
> http://mario.silent-tower.org/
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:44 AM, [Traveller_TNE] <
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Marc Miller maintains he was not intended that way, and elaborated on
>> details while I was working on the Mongoose Zhodani book.
>>
>> I do know that until it is explicitly published otherwise, he would
>> prefer to keep Norris' status as is.
>>
>> My personal view is that Norris is asexual, others that he is homosexual.
>> Marc has stated otherwise, but prefers to leave it for a future author to
>> fill in the gap rather than say one way or the other.
>>
>> So basically, we get to argue about it for a while.
>>
>>
>
>
Homosexual, especially in 21st century context makes no sense. Fitting the
whole Imperial and aristocratic nobility motif fits with a more historical
method where marriage is part of politics, alliance, bloodline propagation,
etc. Who one has romantic attachment to is secondly, if not tertiary to
such concerns as duty. Pleasure even further down.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015, 10:43 Mario Butter
[Traveller_TNE] <> wrote:
>
>
> Is there a reason it matters?
>
> --
> Mario
>
> http://mario.silent-tower.org/
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 11:44 AM, [Traveller_TNE] <
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Marc Miller maintains he was not intended that way, and elaborated on
>> details while I was working on the Mongoose Zhodani book.
>>
>> I do know that until it is explicitly published otherwise, he would
>> prefer to keep Norris' status as is.
>>
>> My personal view is that Norris is asexual, others that he is homosexual.
>> Marc has stated otherwise, but prefers to leave it for a future author to
>> fill in the gap rather than say one way or the other.
>>
>> So basically, we get to argue about it for a while.
>>
>>
>
>