good point, and truly its better to be more in the game than into record
keeping
;)
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:57 PM, 'David Jaques-Watson'
[Traveller_TNE] <> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Folks -
>
> A lot of these sorts of discussions about low-level skill breakdowns
> revolve around:
> (a) how many skills you want in the game (esp. how many do you want to
> force the ref to keep track of);
> (b) how easy are they to acquire; and especially
> (c) what happens when the scenario calls for a specific low-level skill
> that no-one in the party has???
>
> Within these bounds lies everything from CT (at the one end), through MT
> and TNE somewhere in the middle, to GURPS (at the far extreme). Depends on
> what you want to play, I guess.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> David "Hyphen" Jaques-Watson ..at.. Beowulf Down (Tavonni/Vilis/SM 1520)
> http://www.tip.net.au/~davidjw
> "I file things in historical order, with a hashing algorithm of gravity"
>
>
>
keeping
;)
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 5:57 PM, 'David Jaques-Watson'
[Traveller_TNE] <> wrote:
>
>
> Dear Folks -
>
> A lot of these sorts of discussions about low-level skill breakdowns
> revolve around:
> (a) how many skills you want in the game (esp. how many do you want to
> force the ref to keep track of);
> (b) how easy are they to acquire; and especially
> (c) what happens when the scenario calls for a specific low-level skill
> that no-one in the party has???
>
> Within these bounds lies everything from CT (at the one end), through MT
> and TNE somewhere in the middle, to GURPS (at the far extreme). Depends on
> what you want to play, I guess.
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> David "Hyphen" Jaques-Watson ..at.. Beowulf Down (Tavonni/Vilis/SM 1520)
> http://www.tip.net.au/~davidjw
> "I file things in historical order, with a hashing algorithm of gravity"
>
>
>