Interesting. The only thing I know about them is that the few products I've
looked at were rather good, in my opinion. Those would be the Core Rulebook
and Pirates of Drinax, so not much to go on.
Scott
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:04 PM, charles popp <> wrote:
>
>
> Well just look at all the IPs they have had pulled from them. Most
> recently Star Fleet Battles.That was a total cluster f**k.
> 1st print run of High Gard had pages from Merc in it. Plus the total
> attitude of well we are a small company so mistakes happen ,too cavalier an
> attitude.
>
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Scott Nolan <> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> What does that mean, Charles?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:20 PM, charles popp <>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would too but in all good faith can not put faith nor trust in
>>> Mongoose.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Scott Nolan <> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Core Rulebook is setting-neutral. The setting books are in the same
>>>> time frame as CT. Mongoose Traveller is basically a modern update of
>>>> Classic Traveller. I highly recommend it.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, DEREK STANLEY <>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the basic premise behind MongT? I haven't looked at it to be
>>>>> honest. Is it Long Night? 3rd Imp? Rule of Man or something completely
>>>>> different?
>>>>>
>>>>> Derek Stanley
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone...
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 8, 2014, at 9:28, <> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Marc and the 'purists39; don't count GURPS Traveller, T20, Traveller
>>>>> Hero and Mongoose Traveller as "real" versions of Traveller since they're
>>>>> licensed out and not done by Marc or FFE/GDW.
>>>>>
>>>>> Personally, I think that attitude is really insulting to all the
>>>>> people who put in a lot of work on those editions of the games
>>>>> (particularly when GT was so well written and Mongoose Traveller is really
>>>>> popular now).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
looked at were rather good, in my opinion. Those would be the Core Rulebook
and Pirates of Drinax, so not much to go on.
Scott
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:04 PM, charles popp <> wrote:
>
>
> Well just look at all the IPs they have had pulled from them. Most
> recently Star Fleet Battles.That was a total cluster f**k.
> 1st print run of High Gard had pages from Merc in it. Plus the total
> attitude of well we are a small company so mistakes happen ,too cavalier an
> attitude.
>
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Scott Nolan <> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> What does that mean, Charles?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:20 PM, charles popp <>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would too but in all good faith can not put faith nor trust in
>>> Mongoose.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Scott Nolan <> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Core Rulebook is setting-neutral. The setting books are in the same
>>>> time frame as CT. Mongoose Traveller is basically a modern update of
>>>> Classic Traveller. I highly recommend it.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:41 PM, DEREK STANLEY <>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What's the basic premise behind MongT? I haven't looked at it to be
>>>>> honest. Is it Long Night? 3rd Imp? Rule of Man or something completely
>>>>> different?
>>>>>
>>>>> Derek Stanley
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone...
>>>>>
>>>>> On May 8, 2014, at 9:28, <> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Marc and the 'purists39; don't count GURPS Traveller, T20, Traveller
>>>>> Hero and Mongoose Traveller as "real" versions of Traveller since they're
>>>>> licensed out and not done by Marc or FFE/GDW.
>>>>>
>>>>> Personally, I think that attitude is really insulting to all the
>>>>> people who put in a lot of work on those editions of the games
>>>>> (particularly when GT was so well written and Mongoose Traveller is really
>>>>> popular now).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>