Wouldn't even go as far as "as described," though perhaps you have a
citation in mind? Too many CT'ers especially made too many assumptions and
extensions of current technology (or the archaic paradigm, as it were).
___
>From my T989
On Apr 8, 2013 7:36 AM, <
> wrote:
> **
>
>
> On 8 Apr 2013 at 0:13,
wrote:
>
> > Hmph! Virus is impossible. All self-respecting Traveller players know
> that
>
> Not impossible. Just impossible *as described*.
>
> For a contemporary equivalent, *as described* a Virus-equivalent
> would be able to infect my system via my email program (which
> operates by default in *text* mode, not HTML mode) without my
> clicking on any links.
>
> Going from transponders to the rest of the ship is equally bogus
> unless insanely stuopid design features are involved (ie there's no
> rational reason to allow programming commands to ggo *from* the
> transponder to the rest of the ship's systems, and lots of very
> *good* reasons to block it)
>
> My "plausible" virus works rather differently.
>
> The "virus" gets sent to the transponder. The Symbelline
> circuitry/organism acting in accordance with them *physically* moves
> along the wires to other ship systems, grabbing resources for growth
> as it does so.
>
> Every time it enocounters circuitry it replicates the functionality
> of each part, then as it has completely replicated a unit or
> subsystem or whatever, it consumes the original for resources and
> starts simplifying the circuit (most designs using ICs have a lot of
> unused functionality. That is sections of the chip or logic that
> never get used in that circuit).
>
> So it slowly spreads, replacing circuitry with more efficient units
> and using the freed resources to expand its own functionality.
>
> If you catch on early enough and can cut the wires it's harder for it
> to spread and you may retain control of portions of the ship. Or not.
>
> This gives something whose *effects* are mostly similar to the
> published material but doesn't have the stupidity of code that can
> transfer over the wrong sort of connections and infect arbitary types
> of processor.
>
> It's also scarier because it opens the possibility of soome version
> of the virus managing to control humans if it can *physically* get an
> infectious "body" into contact with the human (expect lots of dead or
> nessily not-dead humans while this sort of virus "learns". Once it
> does.... )
>
> --
> Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
> shadow at shadowgard dot com
>
>
>