Re: nuclear dampener

Part of thread: Re: nuclear dampener · 1 reply ↳ In reply to Re: nuclear dampener — Roger Malmstein Re: nuclear dampener — Antony Farrell


I don't remember that.

> it needs fixing, but you made it even worse when you introduced ROF on the
> ND. I think most of us just at that point just put our fingers into our
> ears and chanted “lalalalalala!!!” =0) ROF did not make much sense for
> that screen.
>
>
> --
> Roger Malmstein
> www.travellerfreeport.com
>
> From:
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 8:41 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Re: nuclear dampener
>
>
> Now that two of you say it, that sounds right. I recall thinking that its
> hands were tied by about an order of magnitude compared to what it should
> have been, but we never issued a fix. It should have behaved like an area
> screen, but instead was written up so you had to shoot it at things one at
> a time, which was not at all the way it had been in High Guard.
>
>
>
>