Re: Ships that don't work (was Re: [Traveller_TNE] Clippers and Tigr

Part of thread: Re: Ships that don't work (was Re: [Traveller_TNE] Clippers and Tigr · 1 reply ↳ In reply to Re: Ships that don't work (was Re: [Traveller_TNE] Clippers and Tigr — dcndcn13 Re: Ships that don't work (was Re: [Traveller_TNE] Clippers and Tigr — master.uxi


TSR-2 was one of the sweetest-looking planes ever built. Corgi has an
outstanding 1:72 diecast out. I have one! :-)

Arrow was more in that hulking, F-4 Phantom raw, brute, "I'll fly because
I say so" look. However, we in the US have the Arrow cancellation to thank
for allowing us to make it to the Moon, so you take what you can get.

Actually I think you're missing a few of the UK aborted prototypes, but I
didn't try really hard on my US list, trying to stick with only the
"multi-role, all-things-to-all-people" projects. That's why I left off
F-22, because her faults are not due to that, just basic US over-reach in
general.

> Come to think of it, our forces are 'shorter'
> now too ;)

Yeah, when I heard that they had a 70-some aircraft flypast for ERII, I
thought the RAF must have had to put everything they owned in the air,
plus borrow some from the RN and France.

Dave

> I keep meaning to re-work the RCN Destroyers using FFS2's extreme needle
> configuration (10:1 L/W ratio) and see if a nice tonnage arises out of the
> experiment. I'm with you on the easy on PPT stuff - but at least you have
> a resonable list in the US, in the UK/Commonwealth ours is much shorter:
> TSR-2, HS1154, HS681, Arrow. Come to think of it, our forces are 'shorter'
> now too ;)
>
> Eamon
>