Re: Question for the group

Part of thread: Question for the group · 1 reply ↳ In reply to Re: Question for the group — shadow Re: Question for the group — dcndcn13


I put that in there based on in put from Marc, Frank and Loren.

However, it's happily wrong. I was really just trying to account for all known product numbers.

Hmm... in my notes, Marc received no drafts, and Frank and Loren didn't keep any. Doesn't mean they didn't exist, just that they didn't have them.

Wish I'd been paying better attention, I was with Marc yesterday working on the T5 project and performing FFE housekeeping.

Dave, whatever corrections and additions you have for the errata, I'm willing to translate scribbles and read discarded folded up edits if you have them.

If you have more substantive manuscripts, I suspect Marc would like to talk to you directly.

And as far as the McKinney anything being in error, that won't be the first time. But easily fixed!

--- In , <dcndcn13@...> wrote:
>
> Oh yeah, and the McKinney consolidated errata PDF is in error. He states
> that no work had started on Regency Starship Guide. That's not true. I was
> partway along in writing it. Nowhere close to a final MS, but there were
> several completed ship designs.
>