> I ran across an artical that really goes into some details that make it
> clear that we really need AG (of some kind) to work in SF.
>
> It is an from a real study on making obital habitats. It has some good
> details on the physical results of weightlessness. (This qustion has
> come up on the list more than once.) It also covers some of the math
> for spin based AG.
>
http://www.spacefuture.com/archive/artificial_gravity_and_the_architecture_of_orbital_habitats.shtml
>
> (EDITED: resent as and unwrapped message)
Still got wrapped... :-(
http://www.spacefuture.com/archive/artificial_gravity_and_the_architecture_of_orbital_habitats.shtml
Hopefully the above isn't wrapped.
--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Traveller_TNE" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.