There's no guarantee that a poster has read a certain mail - spam filters can be hit-and-miss.
On the subject of Dr Ganymede - he posts over at SFRPG as EDG, and his Astrophysical info is impecable.
Starviking
--- On Sat, 22/5/10, far_trader_mail <> wrote:
From: far_trader_mail <>
Subject: [Traveller_TNE] Re: Volume:Mass for asteroid
To:
Date: Saturday, 22 May, 2010, 7:30
--- In , allen carpenter <justacarpenter@...> wrote:
>
> can anyone here reach the 'evil Dr ganymede'? pretty much a guarantee he
> will have the correct answer, unless we want to scoop the NASA web pages for
> all the possibilites.
Yeah, cause I totally pulled those numbers outta my as... teroid.
wth?
>
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:27 PM, far_trader_mail
> <far_trader_mail@...>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In <>,
> > "Daryl Frewing" <daryl@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey all. Anyone know what an acceptable Volume to Mass ratio would be for
> > an asteroid? I realize it varries substancially based on what kind of ore is
> > in it, but I was just wondering what an average might look like. (Kinda like
> > how cargo is assumed to be 1:1 by default, unless specified otherwise.)
> > >
> >
> > Typically about 3.3 grams per cubic cm for the common rocky asteroids.
> > Anything significantly less is probably not a solid body but more likely a
> > loose aggregate. Up to around 7.9 grams per cubic cm for the rarer solid
> > iron-nickle asteroids.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to
> think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane.
> Nikola Tesla
>