Re: Death of gearheading?

Part of thread: Death of gearheading? · 1 reply ↳ In reply to Re: Death of gearheading? — Donald McKinney Re: Death of gearheading? — Antony Farrell


--- In , Roger Malmstein <starwolf@...> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:05:21 -0000, "Donald McKinney"
> <don.mckinney@...> wrote:
>
>
> >Now the limitations you mention -- fixes for those have been proposed somewhere, right? And I have NOT seen the laser limit you mention in the errata I've been reviewing.
> >
> There has not been, far as I know, any official fix for any of these
> items. Most liley because most of these issues appeared after GDW
> closed its doors.
>
> The TL*50 fix was proposed after a discussion on TML about laser
> efficiency vs Meson efficiency when it comes to crew. Regardless of
> laser power, the crew was one. On the other hand A meson gun would
> require dozens.
>
> A laser are also more efficient than Meson guns if you compare them
> towards volume and power levels. If I don't remember wrong, someone
> designed a deathstar laser on the TML about then too.

We (the MT community) opened our errata up a long time ago to such unofficial inclusions, but each one has a bit of debate.

As I wrote a few minutes ago, probably time to start using [TNE Errata] and leave "Death of gearheading" to its original topic.