Re: [Traveller_TNE] New fuel storage tanks? and a new piece of equipment

Part of thread: Re: [Traveller_TNE] New fuel storage tanks? and a new piece of equipment · 2 replies Re: [Traveller_TNE] New fuel storage tanks? and a new piece of equipment — roger clark [Traveller_TNE] Re: New fuel storage tanks? and a new piece of equipment — far_trader_mail

On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:13:36 -0000, "rogerclarktopaz"
<> wrote:

>I since ran into a post on the Traveller Web Ring
>that had these tanks spelled out in FF&S terms, below is an example.
>
>TL TYPE POWER (mw) MASS PRICE(Cr) CAPACITY MIN VOLUME
>11 MLH-11 0.24 1.00 200,000 7 kliters 54.0 kliters
>14 MLH-14 0.12 0.5 150,000 10 kliters 13.5 kliters
>16 MLH-16 0.06 0.25 100,000 12 kliters 13.5 kliters
>All the values are per kiloliter of hull volume
>
>The above table is from:
>http://www.reasonablyinteresting,com/traveller/entry_mlhfueltanks.htm
>
>Unfortunately my computer skill level is (0) and trying to find this
>site again is proving to be a pain, so if the original writer of the
>table reads this post step forward.

The link you gave above returns an error for me. I also would like to
know more about this technology.

>This leaves us with the question "now what?" I hat to turn my nose
>up at any new technology, but using the chart above the J-Hawk Far
>Trader would have an additional 874.285m3 of additional cargo space
>if it used the MLH-11 tanks.
>I'm looking for any cannon rules or good solid house rules for using
>these tanks.

In a way I would be carefull to use this in a Traveller Campaign as
they would tilt the balance TNE is buildt on unless you want to
redesign every ship published as this kind of technology is just too
good to miss. It would likely be used by most in the far future.

Depending on mission I think the space saved would be used for even
more fuel to increase the amount of G-hours available.
Roger Malmstein
www.travellerfreeport.com