I think this link is the best analysis I've seen on this so far: A New Thruster Pushes Against Virtual Particles! ...or is a Lab Error http://space.io9.com/a-new-thruster-pushes-against-virtual-particles-or-1615361369
http://space.io9.com/a-new-thruster-pushes-against-virtual-particles-or-1615361369
A New Thruster Pushes Against Virtual Particles! ...or... http://space.io9.com/a-new-thruster-pushes-against-virtual-particles-or-1615361369 Which is more likely: NASA broke the laws of physics, or an early experiment on propellant-free microwave thrust technology has a measurement flaw? If...
View on space.io9.com http://space.io9.com/a-new-thruster-pushes-against-virtual-particles-or-1615361369
Preview by Yahoo
This one has less with the frothy "WAAARGH, IT'S NOT POSSIBLE" reaction that others have made, and more with the "It's interesting and probably wrong, but warrants further investigation", which is how science really works.
http://space.io9.com/a-new-thruster-pushes-against-virtual-particles-or-1615361369
A New Thruster Pushes Against Virtual Particles! ...or... http://space.io9.com/a-new-thruster-pushes-against-virtual-particles-or-1615361369 Which is more likely: NASA broke the laws of physics, or an early experiment on propellant-free microwave thrust technology has a measurement flaw? If...
View on space.io9.com http://space.io9.com/a-new-thruster-pushes-against-virtual-particles-or-1615361369
Preview by Yahoo
This one has less with the frothy "WAAARGH, IT'S NOT POSSIBLE" reaction that others have made, and more with the "It's interesting and probably wrong, but warrants further investigation", which is how science really works.