Personally speaking, as the addition seems to have been made on a false premise, I would ditch Amwold - unless it has been incorporated in any published works.
Eamon
Sent from my iPad
On 15 Jun 2014, at 00:38, "Scott Nolan [Traveller_TNE]" <> wrote:
> Interesting. I see it's also not present in the Traveller Map. So is there some sort of authority or general agreement among the fans for which maps or sector listings take precedence?
>
> And yeah, your interpretation of the 21 Worlds empire makes sense.
>
> Scott
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Eamon Watters [Traveller_TNE] <> wrote:
>
> And now, a star that is there, but should be missing...
>
> Amwold, 2116 Old Expanses, 21 Worlds Subsector.
>
> Not present in Atlas of the Imperium, though present on a dot-map in Traveller Digest 12. Not included in any sector listing pre-TNE. Present in the Traveller Navigator programme for the Old Expanses. I recall, but cannot track down the quote, that Geo Gelinas said he included it to bring the 21 Worlds Subsector up from 20 systems to 21. My own thoughts on that were that the 21 Worlds Empire might not have been completely contained in the bounds of the Imperial subsector.
>
> Eamon
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 14 Jun 2014, at 09:50, " [Traveller_TNE]" <> wrote:
>
>>
>> Harold found a star missing. I consulted with Joshua Bell who astounded me by examining my data and very promptly pinpointing the problem. Evidently, the Traveller Map doesn't like allegiance codes starting with lower case letters. For that one missing star, I had entered "wi" instead of "Wi", and so the program just ignored that line.
>>
>> I've just uploaded an amended map.
>>
>> Now Harold, how in the hell did you notice one missing star in all those hundreds? I just have to know!
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Eamon
Sent from my iPad
On 15 Jun 2014, at 00:38, "Scott Nolan [Traveller_TNE]" <> wrote:
> Interesting. I see it's also not present in the Traveller Map. So is there some sort of authority or general agreement among the fans for which maps or sector listings take precedence?
>
> And yeah, your interpretation of the 21 Worlds empire makes sense.
>
> Scott
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Eamon Watters [Traveller_TNE] <> wrote:
>
> And now, a star that is there, but should be missing...
>
> Amwold, 2116 Old Expanses, 21 Worlds Subsector.
>
> Not present in Atlas of the Imperium, though present on a dot-map in Traveller Digest 12. Not included in any sector listing pre-TNE. Present in the Traveller Navigator programme for the Old Expanses. I recall, but cannot track down the quote, that Geo Gelinas said he included it to bring the 21 Worlds Subsector up from 20 systems to 21. My own thoughts on that were that the 21 Worlds Empire might not have been completely contained in the bounds of the Imperial subsector.
>
> Eamon
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 14 Jun 2014, at 09:50, " [Traveller_TNE]" <> wrote:
>
>>
>> Harold found a star missing. I consulted with Joshua Bell who astounded me by examining my data and very promptly pinpointing the problem. Evidently, the Traveller Map doesn't like allegiance codes starting with lower case letters. For that one missing star, I had entered "wi" instead of "Wi", and so the program just ignored that line.
>>
>> I've just uploaded an amended map.
>>
>> Now Harold, how in the hell did you notice one missing star in all those hundreds? I just have to know!
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>