Oops it was Megaton.
Derek Stanley
Sent from my iPad
> On May 15, 2014, at 3:19 PM, "DEREK STANLEY [Traveller_TNE]" <> wrote:
>
> Thus far they haven't said anything about lingering radiation, I imagine it's out there. They've mentioned Mount Weather so I assume they landed somewhere West of Washington DC in the mountains. DC would be a no go zone that's for sure and Chernobyl's taught us a thing or two about how radiation pools in areas after a disaster. I'd imagine after 100 years avoiding swampy lowland areas would be a big part of the order of the day. I'm uncertain of what the half life is for nuclear weapons fissile material.
>
> It's been more of a Lord of the Flies retelling thus far, although they did have to contend with a big old cloud of acid fog... Not sure how that forms.
>
> I loved Fallout great series of games... How many people set off the bomb in Nuketon in Fallout III? How many saved the game and then set it off just to behold the fury of an atomic weapon?
>
> Derek Stanley
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On May 15, 2014, at 2:58 PM, "Harold Hale [Traveller_TNE]" <> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >The premise is simple, there was a nuclear apocalypse on the earth, some people were in space stations and survived. The >space station came together to make 1 big station but 97 years later the stations are dying. So they send 100 prisoners to >the ground to see if it's safe.
>>
>> There will nuclear hotspots of course. Where and how many depends upon how many nukes were thrown around and what their targets were (strictly military, major cities and communications/financial/resource hubs, all the above...). Global weather patterns may still be altered because of nuclear winter. Results could be anything from Twilight: 2000 to Fallout-esque.
>>
>> Have fun. ;-)
>>
>
>
Derek Stanley
Sent from my iPad
> On May 15, 2014, at 3:19 PM, "DEREK STANLEY [Traveller_TNE]" <> wrote:
>
> Thus far they haven't said anything about lingering radiation, I imagine it's out there. They've mentioned Mount Weather so I assume they landed somewhere West of Washington DC in the mountains. DC would be a no go zone that's for sure and Chernobyl's taught us a thing or two about how radiation pools in areas after a disaster. I'd imagine after 100 years avoiding swampy lowland areas would be a big part of the order of the day. I'm uncertain of what the half life is for nuclear weapons fissile material.
>
> It's been more of a Lord of the Flies retelling thus far, although they did have to contend with a big old cloud of acid fog... Not sure how that forms.
>
> I loved Fallout great series of games... How many people set off the bomb in Nuketon in Fallout III? How many saved the game and then set it off just to behold the fury of an atomic weapon?
>
> Derek Stanley
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On May 15, 2014, at 2:58 PM, "Harold Hale [Traveller_TNE]" <> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >The premise is simple, there was a nuclear apocalypse on the earth, some people were in space stations and survived. The >space station came together to make 1 big station but 97 years later the stations are dying. So they send 100 prisoners to >the ground to see if it's safe.
>>
>> There will nuclear hotspots of course. Where and how many depends upon how many nukes were thrown around and what their targets were (strictly military, major cities and communications/financial/resource hubs, all the above...). Global weather patterns may still be altered because of nuclear winter. Results could be anything from Twilight: 2000 to Fallout-esque.
>>
>> Have fun. ;-)
>>
>
>