Re: F-Tech v. TED

Part of thread: F-Tech v. TED · 1 reply ↳ In reply to Re: F-Tech v. TED — Harold Hale Re: F-Tech v. TED — scott_c_nolan
I don't think there was an official designation, as he was a mysterious figure that the PC were supposed to discover. That said, there's more than enough in his activities to qualify as a TED, and the provision of a decapitation mission in PoT doesn't speak against that.

Eamon
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 14/5/14, DEREK STANLEY [Traveller_TNE] <> wrote:

Subject: Re: [Traveller_TNE] Re: F-Tech v. TED
To: "" <>
Date: Wednesday, 14 May, 2014, 17:04


I'm roadside now but what was the
official designation of the Old Man of the Mountain?  Was
he a TED?  If he was he was a particularly benevolent on
IIRC. 

Derek
Stanley