It has always been a distinction between a ‘terrorist’ and a ‘freedom fighter’. Oriflamme is ours, so they are Feudal Technocracy. Planets in the Wilds are not necessarily friendly towards the RC, so TED.
The moral ambiguity here fits very well with the overall vision of Star Vikings as both bringers of hope and bringers of destruction, depending on who you’re talking to.
Cheers,
Blase
From: []
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 9:53 AM
To:
Subject: [Traveller_TNE] F-Tech v. TED
What is the difference between the Feudal Technocracy espoused by Oriflamme and the Centrist bloc and a Technologically-Elevated Dictatorship? Both seem to have a "them as have the Tech make the rules" vibe.
The moral ambiguity here fits very well with the overall vision of Star Vikings as both bringers of hope and bringers of destruction, depending on who you’re talking to.
Cheers,
Blase
From: []
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 9:53 AM
To:
Subject: [Traveller_TNE] F-Tech v. TED
What is the difference between the Feudal Technocracy espoused by Oriflamme and the Centrist bloc and a Technologically-Elevated Dictatorship? Both seem to have a "them as have the Tech make the rules" vibe.