Re: TNE - Stellar failure

Part of thread: Re: TNE - Stellar failure · 1 reply ↳ In reply to Re: TNE - Stellar failure — dcnilsen13 Re: TNE - Stellar failure — dcnilsen13
Yeah, what Alan said! (And which Mike also said)

> In Traveller, life doesn't have to develop independently. Between the
> Ancients, the Vilani, and all the other interstellar civilisations that
> have been hanging, there's a fair chance that most of the worlds in
> Charted Space are parkland rather than wilderness. That is, they have been
> modified, "terra"formed and otherwise messed with to a degree that allows
> all kinds of handwaving.
>
> While it's a vastly different order of magnitude, the European settlements
> in both Australia and the Americas both occurred in landscapes that had
> been radically modified by their previous inhabitants. That is, they had
> already been "terraformed" to a remarkable degree.
>
> ---In , <mjwest@...> wrote :
> If I remember right, the problem with both giants and main sequence stars
> O,B,A is that they just don’t last the couple billion years required
> for life to develop. That said, it isn’t as necessary to worry about
> the giants, as a few habitable worlds around a giant is cool for the type
> of SF that is Traveller.
>
>
>
>
>